An Oscar-bound performance delivered on a silver platter, “Darkest Hour” makes up for a lot of the money gigs Gary Oldman has done in recent years, slithering through one action movie after another, portraying a Eurotrash or Slavic adversary wielding a slippery combination of dialects like switchblades.

An actor needs to eat, of course. But in “Darkest Hour,” director Joe Wright’s posh dramatization of a few key weeks in the life of British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, Oldman — barely recognizable, supremely vital — isn’t just eating; he’s feasting.

The famous Churchill jowls, the hairline in retreat, the larger-than-life John Bull countenance all require that an actor (who bears no resemblance to his subject) be able to make himself at home underneath one of the most exquisitely detailed makeup jobs in modern movies. This visual realization of Churchill owes a huge debt to prosthetics, makeup and hair designer Kazuhiro Tsuji, a master of his craft.

It’s a lovely performance, and while the movie has its phony aspects, it’s never less than entertaining. “Darkest Hour” depicts Churchill’s life in 1940, as the newly installed prime minister succeeds Conservative Party statesman Neville Chamberlain (Ronald Pickup, glowering over his mustache) amid the Nazi ravaging of Europe. As Foreign Secretary Viscount Halifax, Chamberlain’s partner in Third Reich appeasement, Stephen Dillane keeps his chin tucked low while playing up, slyly, the Elmer Fuddian w-for-r consonants. Dillane shares some screen time with Ben Mendelsohn’s King George VI (the one Colin Firth played in “The King’s Speech”), and when they’re together, the air is thick with royal privilege.

Screenwriter Anthony McCarten swiftly introduces Churchill’s new personal secretary, Elizabeth Layton (Lily James, the quintessence of British pluck). Through Layton, the audience is whisked into Churchill’s inner circles. The film burrows into the machinations of the war Cabinet, as Churchill and his skeptical partners in policy debate the practicality and wisdom of peace talks with Hitler, urged by Halifax, with Mussolini acting as go-between.

Director Wright’s penchant for theatrics suits the highly theatrical Churchill nicely. There are images of Oldman’s Churchill, isolated in an elevator or a bathroom, when the screen becomes an ink-black diorama surrounding a lonely, fraught man of destiny. Less effectively, Wright over-relies on dizzying practical and digital overhead shots of a teeming, fractious Parliament, for example, or (unforgivably) a bomb’s-eye-view perspective as the Luftwaffe attacks British forces.

The most blatant narrative invention in “Darkest Hour” finds Churchill bailing out of his car amid heavy London traffic and taking the underground. He’s on the verge of a century-altering decision: Should Britain agree to compromise with the Axis powers, or fight the good fight? Churchill chats with a carful of ordinary working-class London residents, all stunned and thrilled to be in the company of the instantly recognizable prime minister. The scene may be balderdash, but it serves a dramatic purpose.

And yes, “Darkest Hour” provides another kind of service. It’s a reminder of the power of oratory. It’s an illustration of the value and necessity of working with ideological opposites in the spirit of bipartisanship, sometimes against a larger enemy.

Michael Phillips is the Chicago Tribune film critic.