Censored from Hillary Rodham Clinton’s latest memoir “Something Lost, Something Gained,” a jejune scribbling unworthy of Abigail Adams or Mary Wollstonecraft: “We came, we saw, he died.”

That was the Julius Caesar-like chortle of then-Secretary of State Clinton to a television news reporter in October 2011.

Approximately six months earlier, Clinton had exhorted President Barack Obama to initiate an extraconstitutional, criminal war of aggression against Libya and its leader Muammar Gaddafi, years after he had willingly shut down Libya’s weapons of mass destruction programs. Among other things, Clinton’s war violated the United Nations Charter and international law.

In a presidential primary debate in 2015, Clinton stoutly defended her belligerency as “smart power at its best.”

What did her smart power accomplish?

It turned Libya into a wilderness where human trafficking, slavery and militias thrive. Millions of refugees fled across the Mediterranean Sea in decrepit vessels. Thousands died. Survivors convulsed European politics, giving fuel to right-wing extremists. ISIS established a beachhead. Gaddafi’s conventional weapons fell into the hands of terrorists. North Korea and Iran avowed they would never renounce nuclear weapons to forestall American military interventions seeking regime change.

Even Obama later confessed the war in Libya was his “worst mistake.” He had no cure for Libya’s failings. Its political diseases metastasized and continue to this very day with no remission in sight. Clinton ignored the prime cornerstone of wisdom: Leave imperfections or infirmities undisturbed unless you know of a cure less bad than the disease.

The conspicuous omission of the former secretary of state’s jumbo blunders regarding Libya is emblematic of her memoir, airbrushing out the indefensible or embarrassing to create an illusion of luster. It blemishes Clinton’s character and turns her memoir into a jumble of soporific puerilities.

Oliver Cromwell displayed admirable strength in reportedly instructing his portrait painter, “Mr. Lely, I desire you would use all your skill to paint my picture truly like me, and not flatter me at all; but remark all these roughnesses, pimples, warts and everything as you see me, otherwise I will never pay a farthing for it.” King Charles I, whom Cromwell beheaded, preferred the sanitized portrait painting of Anthony van Dyck. Clinton’s narrative aligns more with the King than with the Lord Protector.

Clinton scampers away from her Senate vote, without reading the CIA’s 92-page intelligence report, supporting President George W. Bush’s extraconstitutional, criminal war of aggression against Iraq in 2002 fueled by the patently erroneous assumption that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction. The war turned Iraq into an Iranian satellite and gave birth to ISIS. U.S. troops remain in Iraq having accomplished nothing in more than two decades other than transforming archenemy Iran into a regional hegemon at a cost of more than $1 trillion.

Clinton paints herself as an unflinching advocate for women’s rights. She swoons over her pedestrian assertion in Beijing in 1995, “Women’s rights are human rights.” That platitude is self-evident, even if women’s rights, like other rights, including freedom of speech, press, assembly and religion, are often honored more in the breach than in the observance. More than two centuries before Clinton, Abigail Adams wrote to her husband John on March 31, 1776:

“In the new Code of Laws which I suppose it will be necessary for you to make I desire you would Remember the Ladies and be more generous and favorable to them than your ancestors. Do not put such unlimited power into the hands of the Husbands. Remember all Men would be tyrants if they could. If particular care and attention is not paid to the Ladies, we are determined to foment a Rebellion and will not hold ourselves bound by any Laws in which we have no voice, or Representation.”

Mary Wollstonecraft eloquently and passionately championed formal education and moral rights for women in her landmark 1792 work, “A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.”

Is Clinton a role model for women seeking emancipation from treatment as sex objects? She dismissed sex-related accusations against President Bill Clinton in 1998 as born of a “vast right-wing conspiracy.” She publicly closed her eyes tight against her husband’s notorious philandering, including encounters with Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky.

It seems it is not that Clinton loves women’s rights less, but that she loves power, celebrity and opulence more that she has stuck with Bill. Actions speak louder than words.

Bruce Fein (X: @brucefeinesq; www.lawofficesofbrucefein.com) was associate deputy attorney general under President Ronald Reagan and is author of “American Empire Before the Fall.”