Still needed: Black History Month
I actually dislike this designation. But I absolutely recognize its necessity in a nation that seems to take special pride in rank ignorance of any kind of history, and certainly that which involves black people who have had a presence in this land since 1619 — that's before the Pilgrims arrived. That is only one reason that black people like me push back when ignorant interlopers of more recent European vintage incessantly vow to take back their country.
From formation of a White Student Union at Towson University a couple of years ago to current battles over public monuments honoring the defeated Confederacy to misquoting Rev. Martin Luther King in support of causes that would repel him — I see the consequences of this absence of knowledge everywhere from presidential politics to the neighborhood barber's chair.
Consider the modern civil rights movement. A study by the Southern Poverty Law Center a few years ago found that most states “mistakenly see it as a regional matter, or a topic of interest mainly for black students.” And what they typically emphasize in public school curriculums — a kind of Trivial Pursuit or greatest hits version all crammed into brief February presentations — is inadequate.
“For too many students,” an education specialist at the law center said, “their civil rights education boils down to two people and four words: Rosa Parks, Dr. King and ‘I have a dream.' ” The study
Mind you, Black History Month — an expansion of an idea for one week each year that the scholar Carter G. Woodson championed in the first decades of the last century — is no panacea. As a nation, we know little history, period. In fact, most born-and-bred Americans should thank their lucky stars that they are not required to know even as much as immigrants seeking citizenship. Consider just a few questions they encounter on a
As much as ignorance abounds, so does a willingness to exploit it for political aims. Just as some blacks were gaining traction for a boycott of the Academy Awards after blacks were so thoroughly ignored in Oscar nominations this year, along comes Stacey Dash, an actress-turned-Fox News contributor. In her mind, fellow black actors like Baltimore's own Jada Pinkett Smith and civil rights activists like the Rev. Al Sharpton are hypocrites for condemning Hollywood's whiteout while themselves supporting Black Entertainment Television (BET), the NAACP and their respective awards shows, which celebrate excellence among people of color and their allies. “I think it's ludicrous,” she offered Fox viewers who received her words as if they were Yoda's pearls of wisdom. “We have to make up our minds. Either we want to have segregation or integration.”
As she spews it, businesses and advocacy groups that were formed precisely because blacks were excluded from jobs and financial backing perpetuate separation. “If we don't want segregation, then we need to get rid of channels like BET and the BET Awards and the [NAACP] Image Awards.”
Clearly, Ms. Dash and the fans who urge her to continue such balderdash have been deprived of even the greatest-hits version of the history of blacks. For school-age children, yes, we need meaningful history curriculums. Until that day, and especially for the Stacey Dashes, the white student unionists and even some presidential contenders, we need Black History Month.