Report: Bid out some tasks
Panel on government efficiency says it could help compare costs
A team charged with evaluating the efficiency of Anne Arundel County functions has released its first set of recommendations — a list that includes outsourcing Anne Arundel’s animal shelter and asking government agencies to bid some of their services alongside private industry.
The Commission on Government Innovation and Effectiveness recently presented its preliminary report to County Executive Steve Schuh, who said in a statement he would evaluate the suggestions over the summer “to determine how to best ensure an efficient county government for our citizens.”
Schuh formed the commission in December with the goal of conducting a “wholesale review of every department and operation” to find opportunities to reduce budget costs and limit expansion of the government’s workforce by contracting with the private sector where it would be cost-effective to do so.
The nine-member group, which includes several former state and county government officials as well as local businesspeople, found overall that county departments are performing well given their resources.
The report notes that “the need to pay market rates combined with profit requirements is likely to make county-offered services more cost-effective.”
Claire Louder, the commission’s executive director, said the commission is recommending side-by-side bidding only for government functions that are not considered fundamental — police services and zoning inspections, for example, would not be bid out.
Louder said having departments produce bids for some services they traditionally have performed in-house would give the county a clear cost comparison between government and private business.
“It seems like a lot of our agencies are doing a really good job,” she said, but “taxpayers think there’s a lot of inefficiency in government. We didn’t find that, but if you stack it against the private sector then you settle the question, because these things get brought up again and again.”
One area where the commission saw an opportunity for divestiture is the county’s animal shelter services.
While commissioners recommend retaining police department control over animal control — which involves responding to dangerous animal cases and checking up on animal welfare — they suggested that the county explore transferring its shelter services to the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, a nonprofit focused on caring for abandoned pets.
If the county decides to pursue the idea, there would likely be a transitional period during which the SPCA receives county money to support the higher volume of cases, Louder said.
County spokesman Owen McEvoy said the county might also offer a building for the shelter.
“The devil’s always in the details with something like this,” he said. “The idea is that the county would save money in the long run.”
Some commissioners still have concerns about the SPCA’s ability to handle the county shelter’s work, according to the report, which noted the transition would mean a quadrupling of operations for the nonprofit. Representatives of the Anne Arundel County SPCA did not respond to requests for comment.
Other recommendations include:
The commission’s report also notes areas already found to be cost-effective for the county:
The commission’s next meeting is July 19. Members plan to look next at outsourcing recruiting services, particularly for specialty fields; offering naming rights to county parks and recreational facilities; and using technology to more efficiently complete processes such as employee timesheet submissions and tracking workers’ compensation claims.