Maryland finds itself at a pivotal moment in history, facing growing energy demands from rapid technological expansion while striving to meet ambitious environmental goals. The increasing footprint of data centers across the state presents both an opportunity and a challenge for Gov. Wes Moore. As major tech companies eye Maryland for future development, these high-energy consumers will significantly shape the state’s energy landscape. The controversial proposed Maryland Piedmont Reliability Project (MPRP) serves as a reminder of the balancing act required to power growth while addressing public concerns about infrastructure, environmental impact and quality of life.

Gov. Moore, the time has come to engage in a serious discussion about the role of nuclear energy in Maryland’s future. If there was ever a moment to seize the mantle of leadership, this is it. You have the opportunity to position Maryland as a model of sustainable energy development, leveraging all available technologies to achieve economic growth, environmental protection and energy security. An Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) must not only consider traditional renewable sources but also recognize the critical role that nuclear energy can play in ensuring a resilient and sustainable future.

Data centers are set to be one of the largest consumers of electricity in the coming years. With their constant, high-power demands, these facilities will stretch Maryland’s existing energy infrastructure. To maintain a reliable power grid while advancing toward ambitious carbon reduction targets, the state needs a comprehensive IRP that acknowledges the need for diverse energy sources. Recent conversations around Maryland’s energy future must go beyond the well-worn rhetoric of solar and wind and embrace a broader definition of “green” energy — one that rightfully includes nuclear power.

The addition of more data centers will undoubtedly stress the state’s grid, raising questions about the sufficiency of intermittent renewables like solar and wind alone. We know that Maryland cannot depend solely on these sources to meet our growing demands, especially with the existing constraints of land availability and energy storage challenges. A diverse energy mix is essential, and nuclear energy, with its ability to provide consistent, zero-emissions power, offers a practical solution.

Nuclear energy’s reputation has often been hampered by misconceptions rooted in outdated technology and misinformation. The truth is that today’s advanced nuclear reactors offer safe, efficient and scalable energy solutions. With zero carbon emissions during operation, nuclear energy is uniquely positioned to complement renewables by providing a stable base load of power. Modern reactor designs, such as small modular reactors, are far more adaptable and safer than previous generations, making them an ideal candidate for inclusion in Maryland’s energy strategy.

The federal government has already classified nuclear energy as a key component in the fight against climate change. Maryland, with its historical leadership in technology and innovation, should be at the forefront of embracing this clean energy resource. It is time to modernize the state’s perspective and accept that nuclear energy not only fits within a green energy framework but is essential for achieving carbon neutrality. Our energy policy must reflect the reality that without nuclear, we may fall short of our emissions goals and jeopardize the stability of our energy supply.

Gov. Moore, your leadership is critical in guiding Maryland through this complex transition. The state’s population is looking for reassurance that growth, especially around data centers and energy-intensive industries, will not compromise environmental values or burden communities. Addressing these concerns head-on with a proactive stance on nuclear energy can provide a powerful message that Maryland is committed to leading by example. We must act now to integrate nuclear into our IRP as a strategic component of our energy future.

By advocating for nuclear energy, you can help alleviate concerns around projects like the MPRP and demonstrate a commitment to reliable, sustainable energy development that supports economic growth without sacrificing environmental goals. This is your chance to champion a balanced approach that embraces the technological advancements of today and prepares Maryland for the energy demands of tomorrow. The choice to support nuclear is not just about meeting energy needs; it is about positioning Maryland as a leader in sustainable development, job creation and technological innovation.

Maryland stands at a crossroads. Our state’s energy policies will shape not only our environmental footprint but also our economic future. The decisions made today will affect generations to come, influencing the availability of jobs, the affordability of energy and the health of our communities. The time to act is now. Nuclear energy is not the energy of yesterday; it is the energy of a sustainable future.

As you navigate the complex landscape of energy policy, I urge you to consider the transformative role that nuclear can play in Maryland’s future. Let’s engage in a meaningful dialogue about how to include nuclear power as a foundational element of our IRP. Together, we can pave the way for an energy policy that aligns with Maryland’s values, ensures reliable power and fosters economic growth.

Gov. Moore, the moment is yours to shape. Will you lead Maryland into a new era of sustainable energy, embracing the full spectrum of solutions at our disposal? Or will you allow outdated perceptions to limit our progress? The choice is clear, and the opportunity is now.

Mark A. Aitken lives in Baltimore County and is senior vice president of advanced technology at Sinclair Broadcast Group, whose executive chairman is Baltimore Sun principal owner David Smith.