


Balto. Co. weighs discrimination bill
Council hears testimony on housing voucher holders ahead of Monday vote
The Baltimore County Council heard impassioned pleas Thursday to pass a bill that bars landlords from discriminating against prospective tenants who hold government housing vouchers.
But as a vote approaches Monday, the measure faces uncertain odds, with Councilman Julian Jones the only member committed to backing the bill.
The other six members have expressed misgivings ranging from concerns that the bill strips property rights from landlords to worries that it could further concentrate poor people in neighborhoods that already have a high number of vouchers.
The bill, proposed by County Executive Kevin Kamenetz, would bar landlords from discriminating against prospective tenants based on their source of income. While the bill is written broadly, the goal is to stop discrimination against people who have housing vouchers, commonly called Section 8 vouchers.
Advocates for the bill say many people who hold housing vouchers are turned down immediately by landlords and apartment owners.
Jones, a Woodstock Democrat, was adamant that the bill is a good idea: “It doesn't force anyone to do anything other than be an American and not discriminate and to give people a fair chance,” he said.
Other council members weren't so sure.
“I'm truly trying to grapple with this,” said Councilman Tom Quirk, a Catonsville Democrat, who said he was torn between the possible benefit of helping voucher holders move to better neighborhoods and the possible burden on landlords who would have to get involved in the voucher program.
Councilwoman Cathy Bevins, a Middle River Democrat, worries the bill could drive more voucher holders to her part of the county, which has a large portion of the county's approximately 6,200 vouchers.
The council's three Republicans — Todd Crandell, David Marks and Wade Kach — also expressed doubts about the bill.
Only Council Chairwoman Vicki Almond, a Reisterstown Democrat, who presided over the meeting, refrained from commenting on the bill. She had previously said she is undecided.
More than three dozen people attempted to sway the council members during 2
Rebecca Abrahamson of Middle River recounted how she had to swallow her pride and apply for a housing voucher and food stamps after she left an abusive relationship and struggled to support her family with a minimum-wage job.
She quickly learned that it was hard to find a landlord who would accept her voucher. Eventually, a friend helped her find a place, and she completed college and worked her way off of assistance.
Representatives of landlords and property managers argued they should be able to decide whether to participate in the voucher program, which they say involves additional paperwork and inspections.
Adam Skolnik, executive director of the Maryland Multi-Housing Association, said he accepts tenants with housing vouchers. But he disagrees that vouchers should be considered the same as a tenant's paycheck or Social Security check.
In the voucher program, the government determines how much a participant can afford to pay for rent based on their income and other factors. The voucher makes up the difference between the participant's payment and the full amount of the rent.
The council is required to consider the bill as part of a settlement stemming from a housing discrimination complaint. Baltimore County also agreed to spend millions of dollars to induce developers to build affordable housing and to move poor tenants out of areas with concentrated voucher use.